![]() Although RCTs or group design studies are commonly used to study intervention effects, researchers also use single-subject experimental designs (SSEDs) to study treatment outcomes as they have many benefits. This research particularly emphasizes the value meta-analyses hold for consolidating results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or group design studies. In addition, research has suggested that meta-analyses are an efficient means for substantiating information about evidence-based practices ( Berlin & Golub, 2014 Harbour & Miller, 2001 Maggin & Odom, 2014). In the health field, researchers have found that meta-analyses are more likely to be cited than any other research design ( Patsopoulos, Analatos, & Ioannidis, 2005). Various disciplines use meta-analyses: for example, medicine, public health, psychology, and education ( Borenstein, Hedges, Higgins, & Rothstein, 2009). Primarily, they are used to synthesize intervention effects on a variable of interest. Meta-analyses are conducted for various reasons. Limitations and directions for future research are explored. In addition, both programs allow for reliable extraction of data between raters and between software programs. Study findings suggest that both GraphClick and DataThief III provide valid methods of data extraction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the validity and reliability of the results yielded by each of these programs when evaluating the results of multiple research studies on the Good Behavior Game, a classroom-based intervention that has been in practice since 1969. Researchers consistently use two software programs, DataThief III and GraphClick, to conduct meta-analytic work using SSEDs. Until recently, researchers wishing to undertake meta-analytic research themselves have had limited options for synthesizing the intervention effects of a collection of studies. In the realm of single-subject experimental designs (SSEDs), meta-analyses have a particular cachet: retaining the rigor of single-subject designs with the added robustness of replication to more fully determine the strength of a given approach or intervention. Researchers frequently rely on meta-analyses of prior research studies to efficiently evaluate a broad spectrum of results on a particular topic. ![]() All subjects Allied Health Cardiology & Cardiovascular Medicine Dentistry Emergency Medicine & Critical Care Endocrinology & Metabolism Environmental Science General Medicine Geriatrics Infectious Diseases Medico-legal Neurology Nursing Nutrition Obstetrics & Gynecology Oncology Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine Otolaryngology Palliative Medicine & Chronic Care Pediatrics Pharmacology & Toxicology Psychiatry & Psychology Public Health Pulmonary & Respiratory Medicine Radiology Research Methods & Evaluation Rheumatology Surgery Tropical Medicine Veterinary Medicine Cell Biology Clinical Biochemistry Environmental Science Life Sciences Neuroscience Pharmacology & Toxicology Biomedical Engineering Engineering & Computing Environmental Engineering Materials Science Anthropology & Archaeology Communication & Media Studies Criminology & Criminal Justice Cultural Studies Economics & Development Education Environmental Studies Ethnic Studies Family Studies Gender Studies Geography Gerontology & Aging Group Studies History Information Science Interpersonal Violence Language & Linguistics Law Management & Organization Studies Marketing & Hospitality Music Peace Studies & Conflict Resolution Philosophy Politics & International Relations Psychoanalysis Psychology & Counseling Public Administration Regional Studies Religion Research Methods & Evaluation Science & Society Studies Social Work & Social Policy Sociology Special Education Urban Studies & Planning BROWSE JOURNALS
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |